Today Hilary Clinton spoke at Saddleback’s Global Summit on AIDS and the CHURCH. She was there to participate in a session called “Conversations with Global Leadership” to discuss the government’s role in fighting HIV/AIDS.
Sitting in the front row I got an unfettered view to listen without being distracted by room full of media. There were three points to her speech - to prove that she is a woman of faith, that if elected will raise funds to fight HIV/AIDS globally and how we need to fight for women’s rights around the world.
Her speech writer did their job to try and make her fit in with the Evangelical audience peppering her talk with Scripture, church jargon and a few stories of how she has seen the effects of AIDS first-hand.
I just didn’t buy it. It was a politically-correct, canned speech. It had zero vulnerability. There was nothing emotional about it. We’re talking about children dying, AIDS orphans, sex-trafficking, a generation of people wiped out in Africa and she was cold, calculated and aloof. All she did was spew statistics at us and general promises to do something about it. This was her chance to really connect with an audience and instead it was just a routine political stop.
Five other presidential candidates, Obama, Huckabee, McCain, Romney and Edwards also sent in speeches on AIDS policy. With Romney, Obama, Huckabee and Edwards, in their five minute, video-taped messages you could actually connect with them. They had passion. They were human. I didn’t agree with everything they said but it was still more authentic somehow. McCain just looked and sounded crazy.
Hilary Clinton was disappointing. I don’t know what I was expecting. I guess I was hoping she’d be more human in person, but she wasn’t. I wanted to be moved by her, to be incited to action. I hoped see a glimpse of greatness, that intangible essence necessary to be a global presence. She is not a charismatic speaker or leader. Her appearance today was empty and ultimately unnecessary.
It’s interesting that many are saying that she wooed the Evangelical audience. I wouldn’t necessarilyy agree. Just because we were polite and applauded doesn’t mean anyone was swayed. You can’t confuse respect for a former first lady and senator with endorsement and political affiliation. Maybe the media just isn’t used to seeing Christians listen to someone with such a dissenting view to theirs. Maybe we, as an audience, are helping to change the rampant view that all Christians do is boycott and bomb clinics. Who knows.
The goal of the Global Summit on HIV/AIDS and the CHURCH is to discuss the role the church can play in fighting the global pandemic that is often ignored in the church today.




